What is an example of a "real power tactic" as described by Kahn?

What is an example of a "real power tactic" as described by Kahn?

• A. A public meeting
• B. A petition drive
• C. A boycott
• D. A collaborative project

Answer: (C)

A boycott is considered a "real power tactic" because it involves actively withdrawing support for a specific action, organization, or policy to exert influence and bring about change. This tactic is rooted in the principle that individuals can leverage their collective power to challenge authority or demand accountability by demonstrating economic or social consequences for certain behaviors or practices. Boycotts mobilize individuals and communities around a shared grievance and send a strong message to those in power about the seriousness of their demands. This method of exerting pressure can be particularly effective when a significant number of people participate, making it difficult for the targeted party to ignore the demands. The visibility and public nature of a boycott often garner media attention, further amplifying its impact and forcing the issue into the public discourse. In contrast, a public meeting, a petition drive, or a collaborative project may not have the same level of direct pressure associated with them in terms of leveraging power over those in positions of authority. While these actions can be valuable in building awareness or gathering support, they do not typically embody the same confrontational and impactful strategy represented by a boycott.

A boycott is considered a "real power tactic" because it involves actively withdrawing support for a specific action, organization, or policy to exert influence and bring about change. This tactic is rooted in the principle that individuals can leverage their collective power to challenge authority or demand accountability by demonstrating economic or social consequences for certain behaviors or practices. Boycotts mobilize individuals and communities around a shared grievance and send a strong message to those in power about the seriousness of their demands.

This method of exerting pressure can be particularly effective when a significant number of people participate, making it difficult for the targeted party to ignore the demands. The visibility and public nature of a boycott often garner media attention, further amplifying its impact and forcing the issue into the public discourse.

In contrast, a public meeting, a petition drive, or a collaborative project may not have the same level of direct pressure associated with them in terms of leveraging power over those in positions of authority. While these actions can be valuable in building awareness or gathering support, they do not typically embody the same confrontational and impactful strategy represented by a boycott.